One comment on “National Geographic blooper continued

  1. wow they’re still really hedging their bets there – “might altered”, “questionable”, in my view they shouldn’t give the photographer the benefit of the doubt, because there really is no doubt!

    nb it’s not beyond the wit of man to re-encode an image back into a raw file if you know the format well enough, however the person responsible for this photoshop disaster is clearly pretty witless to have not noticed the sky should be mirrored!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.